API and IP Newsletter

 

Contents


  • Sun Pharma: Patent Portfolio analysis Part III

  • General information. 

    • Brexit: Key Considerations for Swiss Pharmaceutical Companies

    • Canopy Growth Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against GW Pharmaceuticals

  • Intellectual Property. 

    • Pemetrexed disodium case in US.

Sun Pharma: Patent Portfolio analysis Part III

Below table contains information about Sun Pharma research and development activity in during 2015, broadly say by July 2015 to October/November 2015. 

In 2015, Sun was very much active in general compositions which would be applicable to class of compounds, say alkaloids. Many applications are still being prosecuted (about 40%) and must be part of dossiers of Sun Pharmaceuticals. Please find relevant comments in SIDVIM comments section in the below table.

Publication Number

API

Relates to

SIDVIM comments

WO2017006354A2

apremilast

Crystalline form

Family abandoned. Sun is not using amorphous apremilast in their dossier for sure!

WO2017007609A1

Optha

Optha

Application by Insite Vision Incorporated. Sun Pharma acquired Insite Vision Incorporated in 2015, but later abandoned the family. Optha products might not be of too much interest for the company?

WO2017009865A1

General purpose

Composition

Seems very interesting invention for Sun, being prosecuted in many countries.

WO2017017625A1

General purpose

Composition

Topical formulation may not be very useful. Sun abandoned the family.

WO2017017699A1

General purpose

Composition

Sun must be using this technique in some of the marketed formulations, Sun is prosecuting in US, EU and JP.

WO2017021981A1

General purpose for alkaloids

Composition

There must be products like vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine in Sun's basket and this formulation is being used for these alkaloids.

WO2017025990A1

General purpose

composition

Sun abandoned this family.

WO2017029584A1

Bosutinib

Crystalline form

Bosuf is 2012 approval, Sun must be already late in the development, moreover, must have decided not to formulate using amorphous form and hence dropped the family.

WO2017029586A1

Ibrutinib

Crystalline form

In Europe and Korea Form S1 and S2 perhaps being used by Sun. But not in US. Sun dropped application in US!

WO2017029587A1

Tofacitinib

Composition

Sun dropped this family, maybe recently innovator launched SR composition and had a priority over Sun. But it clear than Sun is working on dossier development for SR composition!

WO2017037740A1

Rosuvastatin

Composition

Sun is using this Rosuvastatin composition for sure!

WO2017037741A1

Clopidogrel

Composition

This aspirin and clopi formulation is not used by the company.

WO2017037742A1

Tizanidine

Composition

This tizanidine composition is not used by Sun in ANDA.

WO2017037743A2

Dabigatran

Crystalline form

This crystalline form is not used by Sun. Family abandoned. There are couple of other ANDA approvals.

WO2017040099A1

Mycophenolic acid

Optha

An application by Insite Vision Incorporated. This is being prosecuted in US. This formulation could be marketed in US.

WO2017042700A1

Sacubitril

Crystalline form

Invention must not be worked by Sun. Abandoned.

WO2017042835A1

Budesonide

Composition

This SR budesonide must be marketed in US and Russia, Patent application is being prosecuted in only these two countries.

WO2017042837A2

Regadenoson

Crystalline form

Old 2008 approval, IV, solution formulation. Generally role of polymorphs would be limited in solution formulations. Sun abandoned this family.

WO2017056113A1

Amphotericin B

Composition

Family abandoned after prosecution in many countries. This composition might not be used now by Sun.

WO2017056115A1

NCE

Process

This is abandoned.

WO2017064731A1

difluprednate

Composition

Sun is using this composition and must be part of their US dossier.

General information

Brexit: Key Considerations for Swiss Pharmaceutical Companies

From January 1, 2021, Qualified Person (QP) certified medicines from the European Economic Area (EEA) will be accepted in Great Britain if certain checks are made. These medicines will not require retesting or recertification by a UK QP if imported and checked by a wholesale dealer in Great Britain. Existing wholesale dealer’s licences will remain in force. (here)

Canopy Growth Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against GW Pharmaceuticals

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, alleges that GW Pharma's anti-seizure drug, Epidiolex is produced using Canopy's patented extraction process. U.S. Patent No. 10,870,632. Details (here.) 

Intellectual Property 

Pemetrexed disodium case in US 

Pemetrexed is a chemotherapy drug that is manufactured and marketed by Eli Lilly and Company under the brand name Alimta. 

According to Coherent Market Insights, the Pemetrexed market was valued at US$ 2,062.5 million in 2017, and is projected to exhibit a CAGR of 1.3% over the forecast period (2018–2026) 

Please note, this market size information must be for all Premetrexed formulations and this case is related to Alimta, which is pemetrexed disodium. We could not find sales data for disodium salt in public domain. 

OB listed patent information is as follows.

 

Product No

Patent No

Patent Expiration

Patent Use Code

002

7772209

11/24/2021

U-1296

002

7772209*PED

05/24/2022



Claim of US 7772209 is as follows 

A method for administering pemetrexed disodium to a patient in need thereof comprising administering an effective amount of folic acid and an effective amount of a methylmalonic acid lowering agent followed by administering an effective amount of pemetrexed disodium, wherein

the methylmalonic acid lowering agent is selected from the group consisting of vitamin B12, hydroxycobalamin, cyano-10-chlorocobalamin, aquocobalamin perchlorate, aquo-10-cobalamin perchlorate, azidocobalamin, cobalamin, cyanocobalamin, or chlorocobalamin. 

Apotex filed NDA with USFDA to market different salt i.e., pemetrexed dipotassium.  Eli Lilly sued Apotex for infringement. 

District Court issued summary judgment of infringement in favor of Lilly. On 21 December 2020 Federal Circuit affirmed district court’s summary judgment, found infringement under Doctrine of Equivalents (DoE). More details here.

Generic launch would be possible only in May 2022.





Disclaimer

Sidvim LifeSciences Private Ltd has taken due care and caution in developing this document. Since the data used for analysis in this document is based on the information available in the public domain, its adequacy or accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. This document is for information only and Sidvim is not responsible for losses that may or may not arise due to any decisions made based on the same. No part of the document shall constitute or be represented as a legal opinion of any kind or nature. No warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, are included in or intended by the document, except that it has been prepared in accordance with the current generally accepted practices and standards consistent with the level of care and skill exercised under similar circumstances by professional consultants or firms that perform the same or similar services.






 


Popular posts from this blog

List of Off-Patent, Off-Exclusivity Drugs without an Approved Generic and Trademark case for J&J's ORS-L brand (Delhi HC decision)

API and IP Newsletter- Recent ANDA approvals and Roxadustat decision by EPO: T 0072/23

DMF filings by Indian companies in May 2025 and F-Hoffmann-La Roche AG Vs Zydus Lifesciences Limited- Delhi High Court decision