API and IP Newsletter

 

Contents

 

  • DMFs filed in December 2020. 

  • General information. 

    • Cascade Chemistry Initiates USD 14 Mio Expansion of cGMP Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Capacity

    • Breaking vaccine patents will only make the next pandemic worse: Opinion

  • Intellectual Property. 

DMFs filed in December 2020 

More than 80 DMFs filed in December 2020. Generally, about 45-50 DMFs are filed per month. Out of which 50% are filed by Indian companies. In December, being the last month of the year, more than 80 DMFs were filed. We are covering only a part of those filings in this newsletter and the remaining would be covered in the subsequent ones. 

HOLDER

SUBJECT

Comments

SOLARA ACTIVE PHARMA SCIENCES LTD

ERYTHROMYCIN ETHYLSUCCINATE USP

Comparatively, small business, about USD 100 Mio product, three DMFs exist already, Solara would be the fourth one.

BIOCON LTD

RIVAROXABAN

5-6 DMFs filed, Biocon would be the 7th. Molecule would become generic in the US in 2024.

BIOCON LTD

APIXABAN

Many DMFs, Biocon would be one among many.

AURORE LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LTD

MARBOFLOXACIN

Veterinary product, first VMF by Gx.

AURORE LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LTD

PRAZOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE USP

Three other DMFs, three ANDA approved. Aurore would be the fourth.

SOLARA ACTIVE PHARMA SCIENCES LTD

BUSPIRONE HYDROCHLORIDE USP

Many old DMFs discontinued, Cadila and Unichem are the ones among active DMFs.

DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD

LENALIDOMIDE

Litigation driven launch. DRL settled with originator.

BIOPHORE INDIA PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD

TIOPRONIN

Only two other DMFs are active, smart selection by Biophore.

BIOPHORE INDIA PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD

SODIUM THIOSULFATE

Only active DMF. Good product selection.

MAITHRI DRUGS PRIVATE LTD

CARBIDOPA USP

Only other active DMF is Divis.

MOREPEN LABORATORIES LTD

SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE ANYDROUS

Several DMFs, Morepen would be one among many.

MSN LABORATORIES PRIVATE LTD

TRAMETINIB DIMETHYLSULFOXIDE

First DMF by MSN. Launch looks difficult before 2027. Smart patent filing by Novartis. Composition patents till 2032 and a bit of work for FDF developers before potential Gx launch in 2027.

OPTIMUS DRUGS PRIVATE LTD

DEXLANSOPRAZOLE

20 DMFs.

ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS LTD

FLUPHENAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE USP

An old product, few old DMFs discontinued, interestingly 6 DMFs filed in last two years.

GLAND PHARMA LTD

KETAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Controlled substance. Not many Indian companies are active. Smart selection by Gland.

APOTEX PHARMACHEM INC

FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE USP (MICRONIZED)

Several DMFs, even for micronised grade, few DMFs exist.

DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD

ROXADUSTAT L-PROLINE

FDA accepted new drug application in February. There must be many who must be eying on NCE-1 date. Is DRL trying for 505 (b)(2) with co-crystal? Needless to mention, Para III ANDA submission is also possible with co-crystal.

DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD

CLOPIDOGREL BISULFATE FORM-II

Many DMFs.

MAITHRI DRUGS PRIVATE LTD

LERCANIDIPINE HYDROCHLORIDE (AMORPHOUS)

It was patented in 1984 and approved for medical use in 1997. Only 1 DMF. To be investigated.

METROCHEM API PRIVATE LTD

APIXABAN

Many DMFs.

OPTIMUS DRUGS PRIVATE LTD

DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE MESYLATE

Several DMFs, Optimus would be one among many.

 

General information 

Cascade Chemistry Initiates USD 14 Mio Expansion of cGMP Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Capacity

Eugene, OR-based Cascade Chemistry initiated construction of a USD 14 mio facility to significantly increase its cGMP pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity. (Read more)


Breaking vaccine patents will only make the next pandemic worse: Opinion

The cost of developing a new prescription medicine from initial clinical trials to regulatory approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration was between USD 2.6 - 2.9 bio (in 2013 dollars). That translates to USD 2.9 - 3.2 bio in today’s U.S. dollars. And the whole process takes more than a decade.

Suspending pharmaceutical patents would unfairly transfer profits from the investors who funded the R&D to generic companies that have invested nothing, and it would distort the risk-reward calculation that encourages people to invest in pharmaceutical R&D. Capital would flow out of the pharmaceutical business into non-pharmaceutical industries that produce higher or safer returns.

(Read more)

 

Intellectual Property 

Takeda vs Torrent and Indoco 

Torrent and Indoco appealed the district court’s final judgment on claims 4 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 7,807,689, owned by Takeda. District court opined in favor of Takeda and matter was in CAFC.

This was drug Alogliptin benzoate. Claims which were contested, claims 4 and 12.

4. A compound of the formula or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.

12. A compound of the formula wherein the compound is present as a benzoate salt

Without going into too much of details, Torrent and Indoco argued structural obviousness based on compound F162 (structure below) reported in US 7,723,344.

F-162

Among other arguments, Torrent alleged that a skilled person would have found it obvious to replace F162’s pyrimidinone scaffold with uracil (in short, structure in blue circle could be replaced by structure in green circle to achieve desired results), citing Bohm and Kim. Bohm discloses that scaffold replacement techniques were known in the prior art as of the relevant priority date. Kim reports that administering uracil lowers blood glucose in an animal model of diabetes. 

CAFC opined, a skilled person would not have been motivated to make the proposed scaffold and isosteric replacements with a reasonable expectation of success. CAFC confirmed validity of claims 4 and 12 of the ’689 patent. There were few other interesting arguments too. The Court decision could be read here.

 

 

 

Disclaimer

Sidvim LifeSciences Private Ltd has taken due care and caution in developing this document. Since the data used for analysis in this document is based on the information available in the public domain, its adequacy or accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. This document is for information only and Sidvim is not responsible for losses that may or may not arise due to any decisions made based on the same. No part of the document shall constitute or be represented as a legal opinion of any kind or nature. No warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, are included in or intended by the document, except that it has been prepared in accordance with the current generally accepted practices and standards consistent with the level of care and skill exercised under similar circumstances by professional consultants or firms that perform the same or similar services.

Popular posts from this blog

List of Off-Patent, Off-Exclusivity Drugs without an Approved Generic and Trademark case for J&J's ORS-L brand (Delhi HC decision)

API and IP Newsletter- Recent ANDA approvals and Roxadustat decision by EPO: T 0072/23

DMF filings by Indian companies in May 2025 and F-Hoffmann-La Roche AG Vs Zydus Lifesciences Limited- Delhi High Court decision