API and IP Newsletter
Contents
DMFs filed in December 2020.
General information.
Ahead Of Tata Deal, BigBasket Sues ‘Daily Basket’ For Trademark Infringement
Q&A With Dr. Reddy’s Anjum Swaroop.
Intellectual Property.
DMFs filed in December 2020
We had covered only a part of DMFs filed by Indian companies in earlier Newsletters. Since many were filed in December, we are covering a few more DMFs in this Newsletter.
General information
Ahead Of Tata Deal, BigBasket Sues ‘Daily Basket’ For Trademark Infringement
BigBasket legal team sent a ‘cease and desist letter’ to Coimbatore-based Daily Basket for trademark infringement (Read more)
Q&A With Dr. Reddy’s Anjum Swaroop
One thing is certain: the industry and the world will be better prepared for the next global pandemic. There has been a huge uptake in digital technology that has in many respects increased connectivity within and among companies. We are also seeing unprecedented levels of collaboration within the industry that I expect to continue. (Read more)
Intellectual Property
AstraZeneca vs Mylan Symbicort patent litigation in district Court of West Virginia
Mylan filed ANDA and challenged AstraZeneca’s patents protecting Symbicort (Budesonide/ Formoterol) in the US.
Symbicort worldwide sale is USD 2 bn. Symbicort is a pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). In the US, Symbicort is only approved for use in a pMDI.
In January 2020, AstraZeneca entered an agreement with Prasco LLC to distribute an authorised-generic version of Symbicort in the US.
OB listed patent and patents are as below and patents in suit are marked in yellow:
These patents broadly cover composition (pMDI) containing Budesonide and Formoterol along with excipients such as HFA 227, PVP K25 and PEG-1000 with certain concentrations.
Prior art cited:
1.) Mistry
Mistry contemplated numerous medicaments that may be dispersed in a propellant mixture, including drugs such as sodium cromoglycate, nedocromil sodium, inhaled steroids like budesonide, bronchodilators like salbutamol, reproterol, and formoterol, anticholinergics, and combinations of two or more agents.
2.) Rogueda
Rogueda disclosed several medicines, excipients, and lubricants that could be included in pMDIs. Rogueda performed tests to compare his invention containing polar fluorinated molecules to several “control” formulations. Control 3 and Control 9 in Rogueda are relevant to the patents-in-suit.
Rogueda found that samples prepared with HFA 134a were on average better than the ones prepared with HFA 227.
AstraZeneca argued that, had a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSA) relied on Mistry’s disclosures alone, the sheer number of potential formulations would have exceeded 2,560,000!
Second prior art (Rogueda) taught away from the claimed invention because the combinations closest to the claimed formulation were unsuitable/inferior.
Hence, there is no obvious to select option in prior art at the priority date. There were neither predictable solutions, nor was there a reasonable expectation of success.
Analysing these prior arts, Court opined POSA would not have had a reasonable expectation of success in creating a stable Budesonide/ Formoterol pMDI using HFA 227, PVP K25, and PEG-1000.
The Court decided in favour of AstraZeneca. Details here.
Disclaimer
Sidvim LifeSciences Private Ltd has taken due care and caution in developing this document. Since the data used for analysis in this document is based on the information available in the public domain, its adequacy or accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. This document is for information only and Sidvim is not responsible for losses that may or may not arise due to any decisions made based on the same. No part of the document shall constitute or be represented as a legal opinion of any kind or nature. No warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, are included in or intended by the document, except that it has been prepared in accordance with the current generally accepted practices and standards consistent with the level of care and skill exercised under similar circumstances by professional consultants or firms that perform the same or similar services.