API and IP Newsletter

 

Contents

  • The drug, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) 

  • General information. 

    • KemPharm, Inc. Announces Orange Book Listing for Six Patents Covering Serdexmethylphenidate (SDX) and Confirmation of NCE Status

    • A patent waiver on COVID vaccines is right and fair 

  • Intellectual Property. 

    • Enalapril Maleate Solution Oral Solution.  

The drug, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) 

The Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) approved a drug 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) developed by the DRDO for the treatment of Covid 19, as an adjuvant therapy.


Lot of discussions about mechanism of the drug in the public domain by now. Everybody knows, it is an analogue of D-Glucose, the hydroxyl group at the second position carbon of D-Glucose is replaced by a hydrogen, the drug works as an anticancer and antiviral by inhibiting proliferating cells of nutrition. There are articles which explain how the drug inhibits glucose metabolism and protein glycosylation. 

We will stick to API synthesis.

It is reported in US6933382B2 in example 12. 

A mixture of methyl 2-deoxy-α/β-D-glucopyranoside (24 g) (synthesis in the same patent as an example 2) water (125 ml) and IR 120H+ resin (7.5 ml) was heated to 90-95° C. for 2 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, filtered and the resin was washed with water (20 ml). The filtrate was concentrated to residue and crystallized from ethanol to obtain 2-deoxy-D-glucose (8.8 g), mp. 150-152° C.

According to the patentee, following are the advantages over the prior art.

1.     It does not involve the use of toxic mercaptans like ethane thiol.

2. This process does not involve reaction of D-glucal with mineral acid, thereby avoiding the formation of Ferrier by-products.

This patent application filed by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi (in December 2002. Legal Status to be checked.

General information

KemPharm, Inc. Announces Orange Book Listing for Six Patents Covering Serdexmethylphenidate (SDX) and Confirmation of NCE Status 

KemPharm, Inc. (NASDAQ: KMPH), a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of proprietary prodrugs, today announced that six U.S. patents governing Serdexmethylphenidate are listed in OB. News here

Patent No

Patent Expiration

Submission Date

9079928

07/27/2032

05/17/2021

10584112

12/09/2037

05/17/2021

10584113

12/09/2037

05/17/2021

10759778

12/09/2037

05/17/2021

10858341

12/09/2037

05/17/2021

10954213

12/09/2037

05/17/2021

 

Exclusivity Code

Exclusivity Expiration

NCE

 

05/07/2026




A patent waiver on COVID vaccines is right and fair 

The core problem is that vaccine manufacturing, research and development is too heavily concentrated in a small group of high- and middle-income countries. Companies in these countries, which are also the main IP holders, have sold most of the available vaccine doses to their own governments, and to governments of other high-income nations. Some 6 billion doses out of the 8.6 billion confirmed purchases so far have been pre-ordered by governments in high and middle-income countries.(Read more)

 

Intellectual Property 

Enalapril Maleate Solution Oral Solution



 

Enalapril maleate 1 MG/ML oral solution (Epaned) was approved in 2016 for treatment of hypertension in adults and children older than 1 month, to lower the blood pressure. 

 Innovator: Silvergate

ANDA filer: Bionpharma

 

Below are the patents listed in OB.

Patent No

Patent Expiration

Submission Date

9669008

03/25/2036

06/09/2017

9808442

03/25/2036

11/20/2017

10039745

03/25/2036

08/23/2018

10154987

03/25/2036

01/04/2019

10772868

03/25/2036

09/23/2020

10786482

03/25/2036

10/08/2020

 

Litigation was mainly about two patents, US 10,039,745, and US 10,154,987

The relevant part of the Claims for our discussion are as follows:

 US 10039745

A stable oral liquid formulation, comprising:

(i) about 0.6 to about 1.2 mg/ml enalapril or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or solvate thereof;

(ii) a buffer comprising about 0.8 to about 3.5 mg/ml citric acid and about 0.1 to about 0.8 mg/ml sodium citrate;

(iii) about 0.7 to about 1.2 mg/ml sodium benzoate; and

(iv) water; _______ ____


US 1015987

A method of treating hypertension ---- the stable oral liquid formulation comprising:

(i) about 0.6 to about 1.2 mg/ml enalapril or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or solvate thereof;

(ii) a buffer comprising about 0.8 to about 3.5 mg/ml citric acid and about 0.1 to about 0.8 mg/ml sodium citrate;

(iii) about 0.7 to about 1.2 mg/ml sodium benzoate; and

(iv) water; _____ ____


Silvergate argued doctrine of equivalence (DoE). Stated, Bionpharma does not directly infringe these patents but these patents are infringed under DoE.

It is interesting to note, during the patent prosecution, Silvergate submitted that the specific concentration of citric acid and sodium citrate is distinguishing the invention from the prior art. Hence, Silvegate amended claims to include limitation of 0.1 to about 0.8 mg/ml sodium citrate in the claim. It was also stated during the prosecution that these buffers are critical to the stability of the solution.

When an inventor makes narrowing amendments to the claims of the application to seek grant of the patent, he may be precluded from invoking the doctrine of equivalents (DoE) at the later date. This is called prosecution history estopel.   

Please note, in below paragraph in formulation patent prosecution in the same family what was stated by Silvergate.

Based on this Court further said, Silvergate  disclaimed all formulations not containing both 1.82 mg/mL of citric acid and 0.15 mg/mL of sodium citrate dihydrate.

Moreover, Bionpharma ANDA was devoid of sodium benzoate.

Court opined in favor of Bionpharma.

News here.





Disclaimer

Sidvim LifeSciences Private Ltd has taken due care and caution in developing this document. Since the data used for analysis in this document is based on the information available in the public domain, its adequacy or accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. This document is for information only and Sidvim is not responsible for losses that may or may not arise due to any decisions made based on the same. No part of the document shall constitute or be represented as a legal opinion of any kind or nature. No warranties or guarantees, expressed or implied, are included in or intended by the document, except that it has been prepared in accordance with the current generally accepted practices and standards consistent with the level of care and skill exercised under similar circumstances by professional consultants or firms that perform the same or similar services.


 

 

 

 


Popular posts from this blog

List of Off-Patent, Off-Exclusivity Drugs without an Approved Generic and Trademark case for J&J's ORS-L brand (Delhi HC decision)

API and IP Newsletter- Recent ANDA approvals and Roxadustat decision by EPO: T 0072/23

DMF filings by Indian companies in May 2025 and F-Hoffmann-La Roche AG Vs Zydus Lifesciences Limited- Delhi High Court decision