API and IP Newsletter
Contents
Catalyst (CPRX) Settles Patent Dispute Over Sole Marketed Drug Firdapse (amifampridine)
EU court adviser says Servier's pay-for-delay deals were anti-competitive
Analysis of patent applications filed by Alembic
Alembic files a sizable number of applications every year.
It is important to note, most of the applications are related to their ANDA filings and indicating towards their circumventing strategies of OB listed patents.
Glimpses of our observations are as below.
General Observations:
Alembic’s patent applications are mainly targeting small molecules.
Patent applications are filed for various formulation strategies and polymorphs.
IP is generated around complex and hard to manufacture APIs
General information
Catalyst (CPRX) Settles Patent Dispute Over Sole Marketed Drug Firdapse (amifampridine)
Firdapse (amifampridine) was approved to treat Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (“LEMS”) in adult patients.
Per the terms of the settlement, CPRX will stop pursuing all claims related to patent litigation between the companies. In addition, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals will acquire certain intellectual property (IP) rights belonging to Jacobus, including the rights to develop and commercialize Ruzurgi in the United States and Mexico.
In return, CPRX will make an undisclosed cash payment to Jacobus, with the latter also being eligible to receive low single-digit royalties on net U.S. sales of amifampridine.
News here.
EU court adviser says Servier's pay-for-delay deals were anticompetitive
An adviser to Europe's top court said the court should back an EU antitrust decision which found French drugmaker Servier's pay-for-delay deals with generics rivals were anticompetitive.
Servier was fined 331 million euro ($332 million) after the European Commission said in a 2014 decision its deals with five generics rivals between 2005 and 2007 aimed to protect its best-selling blood pressure medicine perindopril from competition in the European Union.
News here.
Intellectual Property
Novo sued Sun Pharma alleging patent infringement of Saxenda and Victoza (Liraglutide)
OB listed patents are as below.
Novo sued Sun for four patents US 7,762,994 (the “’994 patent”), US 8,114,833 (the “’833 patent”), US8,579,869 (the “’869 patent”), and US 9,265,893 (the “’893 patent”),
The claims 1-6 of the ’893 patent are directed to a push button connection for an injection device.
Claims 1-8 of the ’994 patent encompass a mounting system for mounting two different needle arrangements.
Teva, Mylan and Sandoz settled with Novo for launch date in June 2024. For Sun Pharma 30 Month stay will end later than June 2024 and it will be interesting to see whether Novo settles with Sun and what could the launch date for Sun, provided there are no other regulatory challenges.
Novo also filed similar complaint for Saxenda.
Saxenda and Victoza contain the same active drug, but only Saxenda is approved to help with weight loss. Victoza isn't approved for weight loss. Some people who take Victoza for type 2 diabetes may lose some weight with the drug. But Saxenda is used in a higher dosage than Victoza.