API and IP Newsletter
Contents
Verrica's drug gets US nod as first treatment for a type of skin infection
Invivoscribe Gets FDA Approval for LeukoStrat CDx for Daiichi Sankyo Leukemia Drug
ANDA approvals in June 2023
We follow ANDA approvals of Indian companies. We briefly check who are the competitors, what could be business potential for the company, we estimate complexities which could have been involved in filing the ANDAs.
In the month of June 2023, total 97 ANDAs were approved and out of which 13 were Tentative Approvals.
Amneal and Eugia Pharma toped the list with 4 ANDA approvals each; Alembic and Sun are at 3 each.
Some of our observations are as below.
General information
Verrica's drug gets US nod as first treatment for a type of skin infection
The green light for Verrica's drug, Ycanth, makes it the first approved treatment for viral skin disease molluscum contagiosum in the United States.
News here.
Invivoscribe Gets FDA Approval for LeukoStrat CDx for Daiichi Sankyo Leukemia Drug
Invivoscribe announced on Friday that its LeukoStrat CDx FLT3 Mutation Assay has received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration to select patients with FLT3-ITD positive acute myeloid leukemia who may be eligible for treatment with Daiichi Sankyo's Vanflyta (quizartinib).
News here
Intellectual Property
Exelixis, Inc. v. MSN Labs
We covered Cabozantib case couple of months ago, where MSN obtained mixed verdict. In the earlier draft, we discussed about compound patent, in this write-up let us discuss polymorph patent. US 8877776.
Claim 1 of the '776 patent states:
1. N-(4-([6,7-bis(methyloxy)quinolin-4-yl]oxy}phenyl)-N'-(4-fluorophenyl)cyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxamide (L)-malate salt (Cabozantinib malate), wherein said salt is in crystalline Form N-2 and said Form N-2 is characterized by at least one of the following:
(i) solid state 13C NMR spectrum with four or more peaks selected from 23.0, 25.9, 38.0, 41.7, 69.7, 102.0, 122.5, 177.3, 179.3, 180.0, and 180.3, ±0.2 ppm;
(ii) a powder x-ray diffraction pattern (CuKa X=1.5418 A) comprising 20 values at 20.9±0.2 °20 and 21.9±0.2 °20, and two or more 20 values selected from: 6.4±0.2 °20, 9.1±0.2 °20, 12.0±0.2 °20, 12.8±0.2, 13.7±0.2, 17.1±0.2, 22.6±0.2, 23.7±0.2, wherein measurement of the crystalline form is at room temperature; and/or
(iii) an x-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) pattern substantially in accordance with the pattern shown in FIG. 8. (Figure 8 could be seen on page 11 here)
Now, for infringement of claim 1 of the '776 patent, Exelixis had to prove that Form N-2 will be detected in MSN's proposed ANDA product according to 13C NMR test criteria (limitation l(i)) and/or XRPD test criteria (limitations l(ii) or l(iii)).
Kindly note, MSN had developed API which is Form S, and had non-infringing argument wrt form N-2.
MSN contends that its tablets will include only Form S of cabozantinib, where MSN formulated Form S as a design around for Form N-2.
Exelixis disagreed, argued that Form S is unstable and, over time, will convert to Form N-2, thus causing infringement.
The parties dispute whether Exelixis has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that MSN's tablets, which will be manufactured using Form S as the API, will infringe limitation 1 (i) of claim 1.
At trial, Exelixis provided no direct evidence of 13C NMR or XRPD test results detecting Form N-2 in MSN's tablets.
Exelixis’ expert Dr. Munson did not directly detect Form N-2 in MSN's Tablets. Instead, Exelixis presented evidence that Dr. Munson detected Form N-2 in MSN's API through 13C NMR testing.
Dr. Munson's testing of MSN's API did not detect Form N-2 in MSN's three-year-old as-provided samples, however, Dr. Munson only detected Form N-2 in MSN's API after subjecting the test samples to “accelerated conditions.”
Hence the court found that MSN did not infringe the ’776 patent. The court disagreed that Exelixis had met its burden to show infringement. The Court said. Exelixis’s expert tested MSN’s expired, three-year-old samples and did not detect From N-2. Further, Exelixis detected Form N-2 only after subjecting MSN’s API and finished dosage form to accelerated conditions.
The court explained that Exelixis failed to demonstrate that the accelerated conditions were representative of MSN’s manufacture or storage conditions.
Thus, MSN obtained favourable decision on polymorph claims.
Decision here
