API and IP Newsletter
Contents
- ANDA approvals in November 2024
- General information
- US Supreme Court will not hear drug industry challenge to Arkansas contract pharmacy law
- Legal and Regulatory Perspectives on 3D Printing: Drug Compounding Applications
- Intellectual Property
- Silimed Vs Polytech
ANDA approvals in November 2024
We follow ANDA approvals. There were 77 ANDA approvals in November 2024. There are 60 ANDA approvals and 17 tentative approvals. The leading companies are as follows:
The comments about some of the ANDA approvals are below.
General information
US Supreme Court will not hear drug industry challenge to Arkansas contract pharmacy law
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal by the nation's leading drug industry group challenging an Arkansas law requiring pharmaceutical companies to offer discounts on drugs dispensed by third-party pharmacies that contract with hospitals and clinics serving low-income populations.
News here
Legal and Regulatory Perspectives on 3D Printing: Drug Compounding Applications
This paper explores the legal and regulatory framework around 3D drug printing, particularly for personalized medicine, considering regulatory compliance, business concerns, and intellectual property rights.
News here
Intellectual Property
Silimed Vs Polytech
The EU patent EP2581193 was issued to Polytech Health and Aesthetics GmbH.
The patent concerns the process for manufacturing implants or intermediate products of such implants, particularly breast implants. It will be valid until 2031. The patent was granted in 2015 and was not opposed by anyone at the EPO during the permitted opposition period.
Silimed is a Brazilian company that is the largest manufacturer of silicone gel implants in Latin America. It is present in several countries and is the sales leader in the Brazilian market.
Silimed claimed to be the inventor of this technology and filed an entitlement action in 2017 in the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt.
The details about the German Civil Court system can be found here.
Silimed submitted to the Higher Regional Court that Polytech was its distribution partner.
Silimed argued that it provided Polytech with all the necessary information to seek a CE mark to distribute Silimed products in Europe. CE marking is a regulatory standard that indicates a product meets the safety, health, and environmental requirements set by the European Union (EU).
To secure a CE mark, the approving authority must be provided with many technical documents.
More details about the CE mark can be found in Wikipedia. Here
It is interesting to note that Silimed was unsuccessful at the first instance (i.e., the Higher Regional Court Frankfurt ) when it requested documents from Polytech that they had supplied for the product registration and to secure the CE mark.
Silimed appealed. Then, the Federal Court of Justice reversed the decision of the Frankfurt court. The judges criticised the previous instance Court for not sufficiently examining Silimed’s claims about the invention.
The Judges addressed the question of defendant Polytech’s obligation to hand over documents.
Senate of the Higher Regional Court Frankfurt concluded that Silimed is the inventor of the technology. It ordered Polytech to assign patent rights of EP2581193 to Silimed.
The German Court recognised the value of the Trade Secret. These days, I don’t come across many cases related to Trade Secrets, but this is one of the rare Trade Secret cases in Europe.
More details about the case are Here
